My initial preoccupation in this
course, as I imagine many others up until this point have shared, has been the
inward looking process of 1) figuring out what my research interests are and 2)
refining those interests into a workable question. This week’s readings from
both Luker and Knight remind us that the development of a research question is
more than a strictly personal endeavour. As Knight points out, “Personal interest
is valuable but it is unusual to do a study for personal interest alone” (p.
22). Knight uses an example of a graduate student collecting copious amounts of
data only to find that she did poorly on the assignment because she failed to
make explicit the importance of the study to her academic audience (p.19).
Similarly,
Luker describes the need for social science researchers to “slither” into
ongoing conversations in order to frame research questions in a fashion that
will get the attention of an academic community (p.66-67). Luker’s previous
chapters made me apprehensive about jamming a research question to fit the
specifications of an established academic perspective. I am concerned that if I
focus too much on piquing the interest of an academic sub-specialty I may have
to make larger methodological compromises.
Hmmm...maybe the idea is to eventually make the case for why a personally motivating question is significant to others? Perhaps the broader implications of personal interests emerge during the lit review, or even at another stage in the research process?
ReplyDelete